Made it – the end of 23 things, but really just the start of lots of potentially interesting and useful journeys. My responses to the questions posed in Task 23 are below – they are in no particular order, so I hope it reads as reasonably coherent.
The tasks have given me a greater understanding of how my students think, and the “tools” they regularly use. In addition it has been really interesting observing what other staff members have done (how they present themselves, their personalities). I think it can be very enlightening (and fun) to see how others perceive themself, and how others respond to your posts. I see that these social networking and allied tools can make education more social (ie. can open communication channels with otherwise “disconnected” learners), more flexible (students can be anywhere & involved asynchronously, individually or collaboratively), more personal (e.g. customisable to individual needs and preferences), specific and up-to-date (e.g. use of feeders). There are opportunities to have access limited to learning resources to specific users, or allow it for general use. A significant advantage to these tools is that you don’t need expensive software (most are provided free by third parties & are accessible anywhere you have internet access). I like the use of blogs to share information (a good example is Swinilearn and it’s potential to share innovative education practices). Flickr is great for sharing images with students, and I see a lot of potential for sharing plant images with my students. The ability to tag, annotate, and add comments to the images just increases the ability to search for particular images and enhance learning opportunities. Podcasts by subject specialists can be used to provide up-to-date and relevant information. Learner generated podcasts can be great for sharing learning outcomes. You Tube and similar videos can be like the proverbial “double-edged sword” they can be used for good or for the not-so-good (ie. to show good examples of educational practice or poor examples that encourage bad behaviour). iGoogle was a major winner for me, and I will use it a lot.
All of these tools need to be managed carefully if they are to be used in an educational context to ensure that learning outcomes are relevant to the training program, both learners and teachers (facilitators) not only feel safe but are safe, and new developments in such tools are carefully evaluated as to their potential before being used in your training program.
I have really enjoyed doing the 23 Things program, and don’t have any concerns one way or another about how the program ran. I will be using some of the tools I have learned about in my future teaching (just not sure which yet, or in what way).